Legal Opinion

Gene's, Inc. v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1963No. 255PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Every municipal corporation has specific statutory authority to adopt such ordinances for the regulation and use of its streets as it deems best for the public welfare of its citizens and to provide for the regulation and diversion of vehicular traffic upon its streets. G.S. 160-200(11), (31). It is the exercise of the police power vested in the City of Charlotte by this statute which the plaintiff has had restrained for over a year and which it seeks to restrain permanently.

When this case was called for trial, the plaintiff made a motion for judgment on the pleadings and that the temporary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Vance v. HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. . HundleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Bulman v. Southern Baptist ConventionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Huggins v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. City of Wilson v. Carolina Builders of Wilson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. City of Concord v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API