State v. . Hundley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STACY, C. J., and ADAMS, J., concurring.
CLARKSON and BROGDEN, J. J., dissenting. Each of the defendants was tried in the recorder's court of the city of Charlotte, upon a warrant issued on 27 June, 1927, charging a violation of an ordinance of the city of Charlotte. From judgments upon convictions at said trials, each defendant appealed to the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County. At July Term, 1927, of said court the actions were by consent consolidated for trial. There was a verdict of "guilty" as to each defendant.
From judgment upon the verdicts defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . KirkpatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. LawingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . ShannonhouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Gene's, Inc. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.