Legal Opinion

Auto Village, Inc. v. Sipe

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 20, 1985No. 1250, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

A Baltimore County jury decided that certain defective automobile repairs caused two vehicles to collide, resulting in serious personal injuries. This appeal followed and five issues are raised, the most controversial of which concerns “Mary Carter” settlement agreements. Appellant, who was found liable to two sets of plaintiffs in a consolidated trial, contends that the trial court

I. erred in excluding evidence of a settlement agreement between plaintiffs-appellees Sipes and the Grosses, who at the time of settlement were defendants in the Sipes action;

II. should have struck…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Cotillo v. DuncanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. St. Louis v. BecklesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API