Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1998No. 84, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This multiple party tort action arises out of a tragic automobile accident in which a mother and her two children were killed. A jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County awarded substantial damages. The only non-settling defen dant is the petitioner, Michael Franklin (Franklin), who was found to be liable. We granted his petition for certiorari in order to consider three issues which we rephrase as follows:

1. Was Franklin entitled to get to the jury on his cross-claim for indemnity against one of the settling defendants who was also found to be liable?

2. Should the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Jacobs v. FlynnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API