Legal Opinion

Booth v. Mary Carter Paint Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1967No. 67-27PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

202 So.2d 8 (1967)

J.D. BOOTH, Appellant,

v.

MARY CARTER PAINT COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Wallace Tompkins, Crofford D. Hancock, B.C. Willoughby and Harry Lee Sutton, Appellees.

No. 67-27.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 30, 1967.

Mark R. Hawes, of Hawes & Hadden, Tampa, for appellant.

E.R. Mills, Jr., Ocala, for appellees Mary Carter Paint Co., Tompkins and Hancock.

William T. Keen and Lucius M. Dyal, Jr., of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for appellees Willoughby and Sutton.

2Per curiam

Appellant, J.D. Booth, in his complaint charged the defendants with the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potts v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

4Cited by147 opinions

  1. Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. General Motors Corp. v. SimmonsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API