Legal Opinion
Flowers v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 3, 1993No. CA A69702PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. He makes multiple arguments regarding the compliance with and the constitutionality of a rule pertaining to confidential communications made by third persons to the Board. We affirm.
In March, 1990, petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with a five-year mandatory gun minimum, ORS 161.610, and a ten-year concurrent judicial minimum term, ORS 163.115. During his prison term hearing held in March, 1991, Board members Santos and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rise v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- International Paper Co. v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maimon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Akers v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Allen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Dewitt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993