Legal Opinion

Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1998No. CA A97110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioners raise constitutional challenges to OAR 291-024-0017(2)(b), (c) and (e), OAR 291-024-0020(3)(d)(D), OAR 291-024-0065, OAR 291-024-0070 and OAR 291-024-0080, all of which were promulgated by the Department of Corrections (Department) on February 7,1997, regarding the witnessing of executions of prison inmates. Petitioners contend that the rules violate Article I, section 8, and Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We affirm.

Petitioners attack the constitutionality of the rules pursuant to ORS…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jury Service Resource Center v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API