Legal Opinion

Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1934No. 5450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This cause comes here for review from the decision of the Industrial Commission upon three claimed errors on the part of the commission: First, that there is no sufficient competent evidence that the accident suffered by Peter F. Prunty brought about the incapacity from which he suffers, or that he was affected by the injury longer than to the 6th day of October, 1931; second, that Peter F. Prunty is an inmate of a government hospital at Sheridan, Wyoming, is receiving $40 a month from the government, and hospital care and treatment, and therefore is not entitled to any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cadwalader v. PyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Chase v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Utah Idaho Central R. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bell Sample Shoe Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Easthope v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MonfrediUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Franco v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Shelby Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Ellis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Anderson v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API