United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. Handy, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The majority of the court is of the opinion that the relator must be afforded the opportunity to prove the allegations set out in his petition for habeas corpus insofar as they relate to the alleged atmosphere of hysteria and prejudice prevailing at his trial, including any issues raised by Judge Boyer’s asserted visits to the courtroom during Darcy’s trial, since the undisputed and incontrovertible facts as shown by the record do not countervail the allegations of hysteria and prejudice. See Walker v. Johnston, 312 U.S. 275, 284, 61 S.Ct. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830.
The court has considered the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.