United States of America Ex Rel. Harry E. Carey v. A. T. Rundle, Supt.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
In this case we come to grips with a familiar phrase: “every defendant in a criminal proceeding is entitled to have counsel of his own choice”. This is a lay expression, albeit often articulated by those trained in the law 1 as a paraphrase of the Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall * * have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”
We must decide whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments command an absolute right to a particular counsel for a particular trial at a particular time.
The relator was arrested on June 2,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Bey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- United States v. Welty, John JacobCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Earl Edward Gandy v. State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.