Legal Opinion

Gratton Earl Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 24, 1970No. 17931_1PublishedCited by 343 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*732OPINION OF THE COURT

FREEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

We ordered rehearing of this case before the Court en banc to review in the setting of representation by a defender agency the rule we adopted in United States ex rel. Mathis v. Rundle, 394 F.2d 748 (3 Cir. 1968), that an untimely appointment of counsel will create a presumption that the defendant was prejudiced and shift to the state the burden of showing the contrary.

On March 30, 1965, petitioner was found guilty by a jury and sentenced on four counts of federal bank robbery based on the holdup of a teller of the Abraham Lincoln Federal Savings…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by343 opinions

  1. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API