Legal Opinion

Nofsinger v. United States

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 21, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-2036-OPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Plaintiffs, a husband and wife, brought this Federal Tort Claims action against defendant, the United States, to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the wife while she was employed at a government-owned ammunition plant. For the following reasons, the court concludes that defendant’s motion must be granted.

The pertinent facts are: At the time of' her injury, plaintiff, Carol Nofsinger,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Steve L. McKenzie D.O. v. Mercy Hospital of Independence, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Hanna v. CRA, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Margie Izard, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger Keith Gillin, and as Guardian of Ryan Keith Gillin, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Mahaffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  3. Matthews v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Bass v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
  5. Guess v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API