City of Aurora, Colorado, and the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado v. Bechtel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
The Cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs, Colorado (Cities) appeal a grant of summary judgment in favor of Bechtel Corporation (Bechtel) based upon the bar of the statute of limitations. Jurisdiction vests by reason of diversity.
In the early 1950s, growth along the front range of the Colorado Rockies began to increase at a significant rate. As the population grew, the need for water also increased. This influx of population resulted in the formulation of various water diversion projects whereby water could be transported from the western slope of the Continental Divide…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Patty Precision, a Corporation v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co., General Electric Company, and Tools Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Phillips v. ABC Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Yoder v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.