Legal Opinion

Iocono v. Anastasio

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 7, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Motion by United Fruit Company to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground of improper venue as to this defendant.

The action is brought by a number of plaintiffs against some seventy defendants for overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

The defendant United Fruit Company is a New Jersey corporation engaged in the business of transporting cargo and passengers in interstate and foreign commerce, principally between New York, other Atlantic ports and Caribbean, Central and South…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Bulldog Electric Products Co. v. Cole Electric Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. American Chemical Paint Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. American Blower Corp. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  5. Monroe Calculating Mach. Co. v. Marchant Calculating Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  2. Aaron v. Agwilines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API