Legal Opinion
Aaron v. Agwilines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
The motions by defendants A. H. Bull & Co., Inc., and United Fruit Company to dismiss the action for improper venue present the question whether, in an action against a foreign corporation, in which jurisdiction is founded upon the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., venue may be laid in this district, of which defendant is not a resident, it having designated an agent to receive service of process under § 210 of the New York General Corporation Law, Consol.Laws, c. 23, or its predecessor statute L. 1892, c. 687.
The question may be put in abbreviated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Robfogel Mill-Andrews Corp. v. Cupples Co.New York Supreme Court · 1971