Legal Opinion
American Blower Corp. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 20, 1945PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Defendant appears specially and has moved to quash service of process herein and to dismiss the complaint for lack of proper venue in the proceedings and for insufficiency of service.
It appears from the complaint and the motion papers that plaintiff is a Delaware corporation, having its principal office in Detroit, Michigan; that defendant is a Massachusetts corporation. Both parties are nonresidents of the State of New York. It is asserted by the plaintiff and not denied by the defendant, that defendant maintains a regular and established place of business in the City…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- American Chemical Paint Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Addressed to Canadian International Paper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Kaufman & Ruderman, Inc. v. Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Clayton v. Swift & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.