Legal Opinion

John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 2, 2006No. 06-1366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The petitioners, veterans John R. Ramsey and Robert C. Johnson, each have an appeal pending before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) seeking separate increased ratings of 10% for service-connected, bilateral tinnitus. An April 22, 2005, memorandum from the Secretary and an April 28, 2005, memorandum from the then-Acting Board Chairman imposed a stay on (1) claims filed before June 13, 2003, for tinnitus in which more than a single 10% rating was sought, and (2) claims filed before June 10, 1999, in which a compensable rating was denied because the veteran’s tinnitus was not…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Ellis C. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Bond v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Aronson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  5. John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nicholas Ribaudo v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  2. Annette B. Briley v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
  3. Annette B. Briley v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
  4. Hendricks D. Caudill, Jr. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
  5. Hendricks D. Caudill, Jr. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API