Legal Opinion

Hendricks D. Caudill, Jr. v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 16, 2006No. 06-1541Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The petitioners filed a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus seeking an order of the Court that the respondents rescind their purportedly unlawful stay of proceedings and adjudicate the petitioners’ appeals on remand *295from the Court. The petitioners assert that the Court reversed the determinations of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) in each of their claims that dual disability ratings for bilateral tinnitus were not available under the law, remanded the claims for disability compensation benefits for service-connected bilateral tinnitus, and either…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Ellis C. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Ellis C. Smith v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
  4. Thomas v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
  5. John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API