Legal Opinion

Hendricks D. Caudill, Jr. v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 16, 2006No. 06-1541Published

1Opinion of the Court

This version includes the Errata dtd 21Aug06 - e UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 06-1541 HENDRICKS D. CAUDILL, JR., ET AL., PETITIONERS, V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON , SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. Before KASOLD, HAGEL, and LANCE, Judges. ORDER The petitioners filed a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus seeking an order of the Court that the respondents rescind their purportedly unlawful stay of proceedings and adjudicate the petitioners' appeals on remand from the Court. The petitioners assert that the Court reversed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. Ellis C. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API