Legal Opinion

State v. Locklear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1970No. 7016SC166PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant contends his motion for nonsuit should have been allowed because the State failed to show any causal connection be tween the wreck and the injuries which caused the death of the deceased. We find no merit in this contention.

To warrant conviction in a homicide case it is, of course, necessary that the State produce evidence sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the death of the deceased proximately resulted from the defendant’s unlawful act. State v. Minton, 234 N.C. 716, 68 S.E. 2d 844. It is equally well established, however, that in passing upon a motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. LindseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kwass v. KerseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. MayoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Barron v. Eastpointe Human Servs. LmeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. CheekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API