Legal Opinion
Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Kohnen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 22, 1992No. C2-92-1138PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondents, arguing that pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 580.03 (1990), appellant did not need to serve notice of foreclosure upon a tenant who was in possession of the mortgaged premises in order to validly foreclose by advertisement. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondents Gerald and Alicia Kohnen (the Kohnens) own and farm 260 acres of farm land in Stearns County, Minnesota. In 1982 they executed a promissory note and mortgage for $240,000 in favor of appellant Farm Credit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Arndt v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Badrawi v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Pole v. TrudeauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Mary Badrawi v. Wells Fargo Home MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HouseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000