Legal Opinion

Gil v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 19, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00184Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DAVID GIL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:22-cv-00184 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC., and ) BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, ) LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION In this case, the Complaint sets forth two counts, each of which asserts a claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1002

et seq. Each claim is brought against both Defendants, i.e., Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (“BSAM”) and Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC (“BSRO”). Count I asserts…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API