Legal Opinion
United States v. Nutrition Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1964No. Civ. A. 64-4PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The United States of America, as plaintiff, filed its complaint for a permanent injunction, which included a prayer for a temporary restraining order, pending a hearing for a preliminary and final injunction.
The action is brought under the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. 1 The plaintiff here seeks to restrain and prevent the defendants from the manufacture, preparation, propagation, compounding or processing and distributing in interstate commerce a product which they have named Mucorhicin.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Schalk v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.