Legal Opinion
United States v. Ciampitti
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 2, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-4004PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Government’s request for a preliminary injunction. It wants to prevent the defendants from engaging in fill activities at the Diamond Beach site in Cape May County, New Jersey, which the Government contends contains federally regulated wetlands.
The Government is proceeding under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. [hereinafter “Clean Water Act”] and the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. § 403 [hereinafter “Rivers and Harbors Act”] and § 407 [hereinafter “Refuse Act”].
A…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ciampitti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Leslie Salt Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert W. Akers and John Doe Equipment OperatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Southern Investment Company, Southern Investment Company, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CiampittiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.