Legal Opinion
Vanzant v. Hall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 23, 1991No. 14120; 14124PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtF. X. Hennessy, J.
In these appeals from a decision of the compensation review division the determinative issue is whether the plaintiff was an employee of the defendant within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act).
The plaintiff, Eddie Vanzant, who was injured while assisting in the construction of a barn for the named defendant, Mark Hall, filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits from Hall. The compensation commissioner conducted a hearing and ordered Hall to pay the plaintiff workers’ compensation benefits. Because Hall did not carry workers’ compensation insurance, the commissioner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Board of Trustees of Woodstock Academy v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Biasetti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.