Legal Opinion

Fadanelli v. National Security Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1925No. 23198PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, an insurance company, hereinafter called the company, issued its policy upon the property of the appellee, hereinafter called the plaintiff, for the sum of $2,500. As a part of the policy is the following provision: “It shall be optional, however, with this company * * * to repair, rebuild, or replace the property lost or damaged with other of like kind and quality within a reasonable time on giving notice, within thirty days after the receipt of the proof herein required, of its intention so to do.” This the company did.

The plaintiff relies upon the provision in the statute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Lancashire Insurance v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. BachlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. McIntosh v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Horn v. Atlas Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Hight v. Maryland InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NO. AMERICA v. County of HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. International Milling Co. v. North Platte Flour MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Curo v. Citizens Fund Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API