Legal Opinion

Galvin v. Birch

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wheelek,

C. J. In the replevin action herein, the defendant moved that the action be dismissed and the plaintiff nonsuited because the process did not contain any complaint. The trial court sustained the motion, denied plaintiff’s motion for permission to file a substituted complaint, and thereupon entered judgment as of nonsuit that defendant recover his costs. Upon appeal (97 Conn. 399, 116 Atl. 908) we sustained the ruling of the trial court upon the ground that the writ without a complaint was void, and that the allowance of the motion for dismissal and nonsuit reached the right result,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haldeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cook v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Thames Steamboat Co. v. Housatonic RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  4. Galvin v. BirchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Rodriguez v. Mallory Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Ragali v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Stanley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API