Legal Opinion
Galvin v. Birch
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The process in this action, which was returnable to the City Court of Meriden on the first Tuesday of September, 1920, consisted of a writ of replevin without any complaint, an affidavit, a replevin bond, and the return of the constable. The defendant appeared, and no further proceedings were taken until October, 1921, when the defendant moved for a dismissal and nonsuit because the process did not contain a complaint or set forth any cause of action. The plaintiff then moved for permission to file a substituted complaint.
The plaintiff’s motion was denied and the defendant’s motion granted,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunnett v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Vickery v. New London Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Gallup v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gallo v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Segretario v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Connecticut Tool Mfg. v. Bowsteel DistributorsConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.