Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Community Service Society

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 11, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchimmel, J.

Motion directed to the answer of defendant Community Service Society of New York is determined as follows: The second and third separate defenses, consisting of paragraphs 9 and 10, will be allowed to stand. I do not decide, because it is unnecessary to do so now, whether a settlement, for a lesser sum, of moneys due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.) would be valid. Certainly in the absence of a genuine dispute it should not be held valid, because unless there is such a dispute there can be no accord and satisfaction. It has been held by some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Stoike v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Home Insurance v. T. A. Gillespie Loading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Rigopoulos v. KervanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  5. Bailey v. Karolyna Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. House v. Cannon Mills Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  2. Barrow v. Adams & Co. Real Estate, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API