Legal Opinion
House v. Cannon Mills Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided February 23, 1988No. Civ. C-86-28-SPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BULLOCK, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on motion of Defendants Tindal and Scarboro for dismissal of the claims against them. In addition Defendant Cannon Mills moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s state law claim that Cannon Mills breached his employment contract. The facts of this case remain as set out in this court’s memorandum opinion of June 25, 1986, except that Tindal and Scarboro are no longer employed by Cannon Mills.
Motion to Dismiss the Individual Defendants
In making their motion to dismiss, Tindal and Scarboro rely on the court’s statement…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Sides v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Mary Lou YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TENNESSEE CRUSHED STONE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ralph C. SHAGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN COMPANY and Asgrow Seed Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Birkbeck v. Marvel Lighting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Kurtzman v. Applied Analytical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Braverman v. Penobscot Shoe Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.