Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hieber v. Oakland County

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 27, 2024No. 4:22-cv-11417Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID HIEBER, Case No. 22-11417 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge OAKLAND COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ___________________________ / OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 63) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff, David Hieber, filed this lawsuit against his former employer, Oakland County, and Kyle Jen, the Director of Management and Budget for Oakland County. Hieber asserts claims of age discrimination under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API