Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Malecha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1963No. 38,738PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial on all of the issues or on the issue of damages alone. The appeal involves two actions which were consolidated for trial. They grow out of a collision between two automobiles coming from opposite directions. One of the actions is by Mary McCormick for personal injuries and the other by her husband, Patrick McCormick, for personal injuries and special damages including loss of his wife’s services. The principal issues which we consider are raised by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cameron v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Brulla v. CassadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Beverly O'Hare v. Merck & Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Also Known as Merck, Sharp & DohmeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Colgan v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Charles Borg and Gillis BorgCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.