United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FoRD, Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain rubber-tipped bobby pins, imported from Canada. The bobby pins were attached to cards which contained 18, 24, 54, or 72 pins.
The case is before us at, this time to review the decision of the trial court in C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 532, Reap. Dec. 9579, wherein it was held that the proper basis of appraisement is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The parties have agreed that there was no foreign value…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. C. J. Tower & SonsUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964