Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Mohamed Anwar M. Hadid, (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1991No. 90-1825, 90-1844PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
On a complaint filed by the National Bank of Washington (NBW) to collect on two promissory notes that Mohamed An-war M. Hadid guaranteed, a jury found in favor of Hadid, crediting his testimony of an oral agreement by which his guarantees would become null and void if he were not given control of stock which secured the notes. On NBW’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the district court found that the oral agreement violated the parol evidence rule and entered judgment against Hadid in the amount of $1,854,875.03 on the notes plus $272,035.26 in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Olney Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Trinity Banc Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Nolan v. NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ozerol v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.