Legal Opinion
Ozerol v. Howard University
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 1988No. 86-1057PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Ozerol is a former professor at Howard University (“Howard”). He alleges that Howard breached an oral agreement to give him tenure. The trial court ruled that the parol evidence rule precluded proof of such an oral agreement, since the parties had entered into a completely integrated subsequent written contract containing no such provision. We affirm.
I
Ozerol is a specialist in the field of public health and international medicine. In 1980 he was a faculty member at the University of Illinois. Negotiations took place between Ozerol and Howard, culminating,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Howard University v. Good Food Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.