Legal Opinion

Booth v. New York Central Railroad

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action of Tort for the alleged conversion by the defendant of a carload of box shooks. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1920, Chittenden County, Butler, J., presiding. At the close of all the evidence the Court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. .Judgment on the verdict. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Prior to April 21, 1917, George B. Breon, a lumber dealer of Philadelphia, Pa., ordered from the plaintiff a carload of box shooks. Plaintiff shipped the shooks on that date from Burlington, Vermont, over the Rutland Railroad, destined for Sodus, New York; but the car was later diverted to Rochester, New York, where it arrived April 28, 1917, over the defendant’s road. The contract under which the shooks were received for transportation was the uniform bill of lading known asan“ order *11bill of lading”. The shooks were consigned to the “order of J. R. Booth, notify George B. Breon,” at a given…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BertoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Spinney's Administratrix v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  3. Davis & Gay v. Central Vermont RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  4. Taplin v. MarcySupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  5. Davis & Aubin v. John Bradley & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. Jones v. Gay's Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Quigley v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  5. Tri-State Produce Co. v. Chicago, B. & QR Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API