Legal Opinion

Spinney's Administratrix v. Hooker

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 1917PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Case for Negligence. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1913, Caledonia County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is a common law action for negligence brought by the administratrix of Edward J. Spinney, who was electrocuted while at work for defendant in its foundry. It was *149a part of Spinney’s duties to line the cupola with moist clay preparatory to melting iron therein. This cupola was of iron or steel and stood upon legs high enough to enable a man to crawl under it. It had a metal floor, through the center of which was an oval man-hole with an iron cover. When called upon to line the cupola, Spinney would crawl under it, remove the cover of the man-hole and lay it on the ground. He would then…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kilpatrick v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  4. Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Folsom v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  5. Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API