Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. v. Widness Ex Rel. Widness

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 2001No. C7-00-33Published

1Opinion of the Court

635 N.W.2d 516 (2001)

PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Kelly June WIDNESS, By and Through her parent and natural guardian Shelia WIDNESS, Respondent,

Adonna Ermal Enyart, by and through her parents and natural guardians, Gordon and Dixie Enyart, et al., Defendants.

No. C7-00-33.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 21, 2001.

Scott A. Brehm, Scott A. Brehm & Associates, St. Paul, for appellant.

H. Patrick Weir, Jr., Leland F. Hagen, Leland Hagen Law Office, Ltd., Fargo, ND, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Current Technology Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API