Grant v. Toatley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Defendant assigns as error the charge of the court, insisting that the court should have charged the jury if they found defendant intended that the beneficial owners of the property were to be Theodore R. Toatley or Theodore R. Toatley and Lovey Toatley, the jury should answer the issue submitted in the negative.
Defendant does not contend that the name of Florence Toatley was not intentionally and deliberately put in the deed. He does not say that plaintiff is not the person named in the deed as Florence Toatley. He merely contends “that petitioner’s name was used merely for the transaction…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Hoffman v. MozeleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Pierce v. HALLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Glaspy v. GlaspyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.