Legal Opinion

Grant v. Toatley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1956No. 95PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Defendant assigns as error the charge of the court, insisting that the court should have charged the jury if they found defendant intended that the beneficial owners of the property were to be Theodore R. Toatley or Theodore R. Toatley and Lovey Toatley, the jury should answer the issue submitted in the negative.

Defendant does not contend that the name of Florence Toatley was not intentionally and deliberately put in the deed. He does not say that plaintiff is not the person named in the deed as Florence Toatley. He merely contends “that petitioner’s name was used merely for the transaction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Avery v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Johnson v. . LeavittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Hoffman v. MozeleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Pierce v. HALLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Glaspy v. GlaspyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API