Legal Opinion
Pierce v. HALL
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Plaintiff brings this suit to quiet the title to certain real property located in Multnomah county. Defendants appeal from a decree for the plaintiff.
On September 2, 1947, plaintiff and Roberta L. Pierce, entered into a contract to purchase the subject property. The contract describes the purchasers as “Benjamin Pierce and Roberta L. Pierce—husband and wife.” This recital, if accepted as true, would be sufficient to create in the purchasers a tenancy by the entirety in an equitable estate in the land described. Indiana Trust Co. v. Sherer, 96 Ind App 62, 180 NE 603 (1932); Zeigen v. Roiser,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Ganoe v. OhmartOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Danes v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Hernandez v. PrietoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Porter v. LandisMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of McCrackenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1966
- In Re LubyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1988
- In re Estate of McCrackenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1966