Legal Opinion

Lubetzky v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1991No. S013552PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner was denied admission to practice law after a hearing panel of the State Bar determined that he had “not proven that he is possessed of good moral character” within the meaning of rule X of the Rules Regulating Admission to Practice Law in California. The review department affirmed that ruling without dissent, two members abstaining. Our review of the entire record persuades us that the evidence does not support the findings of the hearing panel as to petitioner’s moral character. We therefore decline to accord those findings any weight. Instead, we conclude in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Williams v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunsucker v. Sunnyvale Hilton InnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. In Re MennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re GossageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Johnson v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
  5. In Re BediDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API