in the Interest of I.L.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Jane Bland, Justice
In this consolidated parental termination case, the Department of Family and Protective Services requested termination of the father’s parental rights to his three children, A.A.M., J.M., and I.L.M. The trial court granted the Department’s request. On appeal, the father contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support termination' of his paréntal rights. He further contends that the trial court erred when it considered evidence of conduct adduced in connection with the Department’s earlier, unsuccessful request for termination of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re J.O.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Interest C.S. Jr. and Z.S., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
- In the Interest of A.H., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
- In the Interest of C.M. and D.M., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024
- In the Interest of D.M., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
- In the Interest of O.S.G., O.N v. and O.H v. Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.