Legal Opinion

Okmulgee Plumbing Co. v. Comstock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1926No. 16259PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This suit was instituted in the superior co-urt of Okmulgee county by H. E. Ketcham, one of the defendants in error, as plaintiff, against T. Manning, A, B. Comstock, and others, for the purpose of foreclosing a materialman’s lien upon certain property described as “lot 11, Dei'riek and Walker addition to the city of Okrnu1 gee, Oklahoma. ”

The facts disclosed by the record, briefly stated, are as follows: On or about the 4th day of August, 1923, the defendant A. B. Comstock made an'arrangement with the defendant T. Manning, whereby he, Comstock, agreed to sell "he caid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Gentry-Bowers Lumber Co. v. HamillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Thomas v. Soper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Braden Co. v. Lancaster Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Pirtle v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Kerfoot v. SalyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Oklahoma Hardware Company v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API