Legal Opinion

Rhawn v. Pearce

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1884PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Sidney Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit, by attachment, brought by appellees, against John Landenberger, a resident of Pennsylvania. The writ was issued on the 17th day of January, 1883, and served on John V. Farwell & Co., of Chicago, as garnishees, on the day following. The garnishees answered, showing an indebtedness from them to Landenberger of $4259.91. On the 13th of February judgment was rendered against Landenberger, and in his favor for the use of appellees, against the Farwells, for the sum admitted due by the answer. At a subsequent day the judgment, on motion of appellants, was vacated,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Willitts v. . WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Abraham v. PlestoroCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
  4. Paine v. LesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. Einer v. BesteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Barth v. . BackusNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Gilman v. KetchamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Sercomb v. CatlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. J. Walter Thompson Co. v. WhitehedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API