Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the La Porte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.
The question for decision arises upon the following facts:
Clapp & Davies, partners, doing business in the city of Chicago, were indebted to certain judgment creditors resid*478ing in that city. They were also indebted to the Wilcox Silver-Plate Company, and others who were residents of the State of Connecticut. At the same time Bagley & Oberreich, partners, residing and doing business at La Porte, Indiana, were indebted in a considerable sum to Clapp & Davies. One of the judgment creditors instituted proceedings in chancery against the latter firm by filing a creditor’s bill in the Superior Court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Green v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wyman v. HalsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Ward v. Connecticut Pipe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Broadway National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Dodgem Corp. v. D. D. Murphy Shows, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Bloomingdale v. WeilWashington Supreme Court · 1902
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.