Legal Opinion

Lee v. Barksdale

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1986No. 854SC852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendants contend the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and in denying defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). We disagree.

On a motion for summary judgment, the moving party has the burden of showing (i) the lack of a triable issue of fact and (ii) that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Moore v. Crumpton, 306 N.C. 618, 295 S.E. 2d 436 (1982). The record discloses that the essential facts in this case are not in dispute. The question before the trial court was whether plaintiff Lee, as Executor,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrumptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Fowler v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Pittman v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Lyle v. . SilerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Cummings v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Leonard v. DillardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Conte v. PilschFairfax County Circuit Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API