Legal Opinion

Dean v. Mattox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1959No. 453PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Appellant, in his brief, presente three questions, viz.: 1. “Was the plaintiff estopped to rely upon an oral description and to deny a description by metes and bounds, as shown in >a plat of the 176.1 -acres of land, upon which the timber conveyed to him lay, when he had the plat and earned it, with the defendant’s Option to Purchase said lands, to -hi.s own -attorneys who drew the timber deed, which timber deed referred ¡to the plat?” 2. If not, did the -court err “in refusing to submit the question -of estoppel to the jury?” 3. Did the count err “in adding interest to the amount to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Simms v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Barber-Paschal Lumber Co. v. BoushallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. McBryde v. COGGINS-McINTOSH LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Queen v. SiskSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Housecalls Home Health Care, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Newport HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API