Legal Opinion

Chicago Seating Co. v. S. Karpen & Bros.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 22, 1949No. 9871PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

By this appeal it is sought to reverse an order of the District Court which dismissed, on defendant’s motion, an amended complaint seeking treble damages for violation of section 2(e) of the Qayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(e). Both appellant, Chicago Seating Company, and defendant-appellee, S. Karpen and Bros., are Illinois corporations.

The amended complaint alleged in paragraph one that both plaintiff and defendant are engaged in interstate commerce and that jurisdiction arises under the provisions of section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond Bros.-ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Shaw's, Inc. v. Wilson-Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. M. C. Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Texas Foundries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Perry Mullis, D/B/A Mullis Petroleum Co. v. Arco Petroleum Corporation and Atlantic Richfield CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Philip Klein v. The Lionel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Hartley & Parker, Inc. v. Florida Beverage Corporation and American Distilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Z. T. Naifeh, Dba Sooner Sales Co. v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API