Legal Opinion
Martin v. Indiana Michigan Power Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 30, 2002No. 1:00-cr-00218PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MILES, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Herbert Armitage filed this action against his employer, Indiana Michigan Power Company, d/b/a American Electric Power (“AEP”), alleging violations of the overtime pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. On January 9, 2002, the court issued an order granting summary judgment in Mr. Armitage’s favor on the issue of AEP’s liability for violation of the FLSA.
The issue of damages was tried before the court sitting without a jury over a two-day period beginning on February 6,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richman v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- CFM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. Mitts Telecasting CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Johnson v. Labtox, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.