Legal Opinion

Shaw's, Inc. v. Wilson-Jones Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 28, 1939No. 7015PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Shaw’s, Inc., the appellant, a Pennsylvania corporation, filed suit in the court below against Wilson-Jones Company, the appellee, a Massachusetts corporation, and sought treble damages pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 (15 U.S.C.A. § 15). In its complaint the appellant alleges that the appellee unlawfully discriminated in price against the appellant in violation of the provisions of Section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, § 1, 49 Stat. 1526 (15 U. S.C.A. § 13(a).

The appellee filed a…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Foremost Pro Color, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. M. C. Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Texas Foundries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Atlas Building Products Co. v. Diamond Block & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Perry Mullis, D/B/A Mullis Petroleum Co. v. Arco Petroleum Corporation and Atlantic Richfield CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API